In the world of professional boxing, the judges’ decisions can often lead to heated discussions, and the recent rematch between Artur Beterbiev and Dmitry Bivol is no exception. Despite being favored by many spectators and experts in the first half of the fight, Beterbiev, with a record of 21 wins and only one loss, succumbed to a majority decision defeat after 12 grueling rounds at The Venue in Riyadh. Coach Marc Ramsay candidly expressed his belief that Beterbiev was in control, leading the scorecard 5-1 after the initial six rounds. Ramsay’s analysis of the fight illuminates the discrepancies in judging that can leave both fighters and fans questioning the integrity of the sport.
The bout commenced with an aggressive start from Beterbiev, who was undoubtedly the stronger fighter in the early rounds. Ramsay pointed out that Beterbiev clearly won rounds one, three, four, five, six, and twelve. Particularly noteworthy was round twelve, where Beterbiev visibly hurt Bivol, making it seem like a final revelatory moment for the judges to reconsider their scoring. However, this lucid performance was not enough to convince the judges, who scored the fight 115-113 and 116-112 in favor of Bivol, with one scorecard reflecting a tie at 114-114. Given the dominance displayed by Beterbiev at various junctures—especially during the middle rounds—these scores raised eyebrows among fans and analysts alike.
Following the match, the nagging question remained: does Beterbiev now face a recurring issue with biased judging? Coach Ramsay pointed out the egregious nature of Bivol’s defensive tactics during the later rounds of the fight, which some critics have dismissed as mere survival. Many fans were left frustrated at the thought of Beterbiev potentially being robbed again in a possible trilogy bout. If this were to occur, Beterbiev might find it more prudent to shift focus to fights against other formidable contenders such as David Benavidez or Callum Smith—bouts that not only promise a more engaging spectacle but may also present fairer judging landscapes.
Beterbiev’s performance illustrates the complexities and controversies that surround the world of boxing. The perceived injustice of his latest defeat could galvanize Beterbiev to channel his frustration into future training and performances, ensuring he leaves no room for doubt in his next encounters. As fans and analysts closely monitor his trajectory moving forward, the echoes of this fight will likely serve as a pivotal learning moment for a fighter who has already proven his mettle in the ring. The hope remains that future bouts will include clearer scoring, allowing for the fighters to gain recognition based on their performances rather than contentious call-outs.
Leave a Reply